US English Corpus Tokens

  • Home >>

  • Purpose >>

  • Cleft >> Constructions 

  • Corpora >>

  • Frequency of It-clefts >>

  • Frequency of Discourse Functions >>

  • Rate of Use of Discourse Functions >>

  • Usage Differential of Discourse Functions >>

  • US English Tokens  >>

  • US Spanish Tokens >>

  • Non-US  >> Spanish Tokens

  • References >>

It is not until sometime later, when Albert brings home his old flame Shug Avery, that Celie is enabled, with Shug’s help, to find Nettie’s letters to her.
It is the seemingly inappropriate nightclub singer Shug Avery, however, who provides Celie with an extended period of “female bonding”; who, with unconditional love, provides a “holding environment” in which Celie’s nascent self is reflected back to itself; and, who, as surrogate and “good-enough mother,” and lover, helps Celie to complete the development of those capacities that enable her to deal more effectively with loss, to finalize her gender identity and choice of mature love object, and to develop a stable sense of self.
Although Celie has found a “good-enough mother” in Shug, it is only when Shug can provide an extended “holding environment” that Celie can build upon the efforts of previous mother surrogates and, in bonding with Shug, complete her previously stymied psychological development.
It is also in this bedroom scene that the women become lovers.
It is the narrator who tells us that days already harmonious and pleasurable were “enhanced” by what is about to be related: …
… ; and while it may be the general reader and not the critical one who takes language as “a matter of course,” even the most perspicacious fox hunters among us are obviously supposed to be “stirred” to “surprise and pleasure” at Hawkes’s demonstration of verbal dressage.
Even though I believe it is versions of Cassandra which may be identified most often within the text, the ancient myth of her refusal of Apollo, her prophetic powers made unbelievable, her capture, bondage, and death do not play themselves out in a contemporary enactment of the old story.
It’s particularly in the exchanges between the middle-aged Sandra and Wally, however, contestants in the battle of the sexes, that Brook-Rose both parodies and foregrounds the stereotypes of sexual politics—a version of the future that sounds horrifyingly familiar.
It is through such self-acknowledged strategies that Sandra survives; …
It isn’t Cassandra’s sex which makes her an obvious representative for the woman innovator; it is both her creative power, related to divine sources but gained through sexual bargaining with Apollo, and the absence of a believing and accepting audience.
Whereas Stephen is observed at a distance, cast, as Joanne V. Creighton says, as a “stagey and unredeemed villain” (42), and Sophy and Mike play very minor roles, in The Middle Ground it is Kate herself who has been misusing comedy.
But is it only with the eye that we “see” such “things”?
Yet it is from within this breach opened up by the "intensity of seeing” that Oppen has “made poetry.”
As I have argued, it is the pre-position of “Being” that makes possible the context in which we can be “among” anything at all.
I think it is significant that Oppen once again uses a deictic pronoun to point out that it is a certain type of “truthfulness” [0] he offers, and, as I have argued, “that” truthfulness is best conceived in terms of recognition of others rather than agreement of propositions.
It is both because of and despite the fact that “we”—once again a word “among” others in the poem—are obsessed and bewildered with and by the “singular” that we choose to be among others, which is, I suspect, a principal “meaning of being numerous.”
It is in this latter sense, I believe, that Oppen wants us to look to language, and to the language in poems specifically, as “a test of truth” or “a test of sincerity,” which would demonstrate “that there is a moment, an actual time, when you believe something to be true, and you construct a meaning from these moments of conviction” (“Oppen” 161).
In short, it is a Heidegger, and not a Proust, who should become our “central” figure and should absorb our critical attention.
Insofar as the intellectual’s career of “self-revision” has an impact upon and/or reflects the historically important issues of the culture as a whole, it is to that extent that “self-revision” becomes worthy of extended analysis and meditation.
It is precisely because “art is a fait accompli,” which is treated on the surface as a matter for grief, that it is able to “survive.” 
This passage is doubly important for us, however, because it so happens that it is here that the content of the poem also comes to its sharpest point.
And it is here that Auden formulates the weltanschauung on which the more practical resolutions of the final, third part of the poem will be based.
Beloved’s character is both the frame and center of the book, and it is her story—or her desperate struggle to know and experience her own story—that is the pumping heart of the novel.